Australian Adult Adoptees Silenced by Commonwealth Parliamentary Inquiry into Local Adoption

by Elizabeth Russell

On Tuesday 27th November 2018, the Federal Liberal MP for Chisolm, Ms Julia Banks, resigned from the Liberal party and announced her intention to continue serving the Australian people as an Independent member of the House of Representatives.

In her speech, Ms Banks said that the ‘gift of time and reflection’ had provided her with clarity regarding ‘the coup’, as she defined it, that resulted in the Liberal party’s leadership change in August. She said, the coup had been aided by many who ‘traded their vote for personal gain – individual promotion, pre-selection endorsements… or silence’.

The position of women in politics, said Banks, ‘is years behind the business world’ and emphasising the need for a whistle-blower’ system… ‘to enable reporting of misconduct’. She said, ‘Often, when good women call out or are subjected to bad behaviour, the reprisals, backlash and commentary, portrays them as the bad ones – the liar, the trouble maker, the emotionally unstable or weak or someone who should be silenced’.

In conclusion, Ms Banks articulated, ‘…the hallmark characteristics of the Australian woman… are resilience and a strong authentic independent spirit’, clarifying her decision was motivated by the actions of ‘the reactionary and regressive right wing…. (who) talk about and to themselves, rather than listening to the people’.

Adoptee Rights Australia Inc. (ARA Inc.) acknowledge Ms Banks’ passionate words of commitment to democratic process, ‘sensible centre values’ and for reminding us all that our politicians’ chief task is to listen and respond to the voices and concerns of the Australian people.

However, from May this year, while heading the Parliament of Australia’s Committee Inquiry into Local Adoption, Ms Banks effectively silenced Australian adult adoptees by refusing members of ARA Inc. the benefit of a public hearing.

Ms Banks’ committee determined, without providing adult adoptees their democratic right to a public platform from which to speak. The lived experience of people who were adopted under ‘closed-records’ aka ‘forced’ adoption policy and practices was stated to have no relevance to the proposed development of ‘new’ adoption policies for Australia in the 21st century.

Adult adoptees’ who provided written submissions to the Inquiry were given this ‘option’: content of their submissions would be censored or their name withheld (see report submissions).

Justification for this centred around policies of secrecy and concerns that were obviously related to the pervasive familial, social and political silence in adoption of ‘the past’. Therefore, Ms Banks’ committee effectively silenced and suppressed the political concerns of Australian adult adoptees and constituents of our democracy, who due to the very nature of ‘closed-record’ adoption policy, have not, to date, had any social or political voice.

Thus, the resilient and authentic spirit of Australian adult adoptees were denied opportunity to provide insight into what ‘being adopted’ means and to debate their concerns about the potential impact of so-called ‘new’ Australian adoption policies. Repeatedly, adult adoptees were told that adoption isn’t ‘like that’ anymore (though sympathy regarding past policy and practice was relayed).

Yet, just last week, on Thursday 22nd November, the NSW Minister for Family and Community Services, Ms Pru Goward, despite adoptee community and aboriginal protests and the valiant attempt to prevent repetition of past adoption policy, Goward’s ‘new local adoption’ bill was passed into legislation.

This ‘new’ adoption policy provides NSW government adoption authorities and private agencies with the power to impose adoption on infants and young children, after or within 2 years of being placed in Out of Home Care, ‘without parental consent’.

Prophetically, this new adoption bill was passed after FACS NSW had already begun advertising ‘local adoption’.

In a new advertising campaign, a very young adopted child is presented to viewers through only the perspective of her adoptive parents. Entitled ‘A Perfect Match’, the ad’s language harks back to past practices when babies and children were ‘matched’ to their adopters.

Adoption was sold as the ‘one size fits all’ solution to social problems of poverty, single motherhood, the ‘unwanted’ child, illegitimacy and infertility, in one fell swoop.

In this ad, the adopted child’s adoptive parents ‘talk about’ her – she is too young to grasp the intent of the advertisement. Her adoptive mother says the little girl has ‘completed me’ and again, the notion that the grief of infertility is resolved by adopting someone else’s baby harks back to past narratives and false claims that adoption completes life for people who are unable to have their own children.

What adult adoptees hear in this distinctly familiar adoption narrative, is the political, social and familial construction and silencing of the adoptee. This little girl is being inappropriately used, commodified by FACS NSW, in the language of adults in power. The child’s family’s story is silenced – her legal rights are silenced and ignored – and the NSW government is presenting adoption as ‘open’ and ‘different’ to the past.

To date there have been no comprehensive studies of ‘open’ or ‘closed-record’ adoption outcomes in Australia to justify such claims of difference.

Government apology for policies and practices of the past, connects the failures of legal adoption to each of Australia’s four national government apologies – that is, apologies to: The Indigenous Stolen Generations; The Forgotten Australians; mothers and adult adoptees of ‘Forced Adoption’; and, most recently, the Commonwealth Liberal government’s apology to victims of ‘Institutional Abuse’.

Missing from this list is the yet to be acknowledged lifelong impact of separation ‘at or soon after birth’ on the adoptee, and the evident physical, sexual and emotional abuse and/or neglect of adopted children inside their adoptive homes.

No-one, least of all adult adoptees, argues that children should not be ‘bounced around’ or ‘languish’ in foster care or that they should be subjected to ongoing abuse or neglect by their families of origin. Australian adult adoptees argue that of course, all children deserve continuity of care, love and security – but, we argue, love and security does not require legal adoption.

Legal guardianship, permanent care orders and Family Stewardship programming offer children protection while preserving their rights to their identity (original birth certificates) and ongoing legal and physical connection to their biological families.

By silencing Australian adult adoptees, Ms Banks’ committee has robbed the Australian public of accurate information through democratic process – that is, through ‘listening’ to our authentic knowledge. In silencing adult adoptees, talking about us but not to us, the Commonwealth government is now perpetuating the myth that adoption is a ‘risk free’ child protection system and that a fairy tale ‘forever family’ will be provided through ‘forced adoption’.

On Monday the 26th November, the report from Committee Inquiry into Local Adoption was published, entitled, ‘Breaking barriers: a national adoption framework for Australian children’.

The Committees’ recommendations include: –

  • that the Commonwealth work with state and territory governments to achieve agreement, through the Council of Australian Governments, to develop and enact a national law for adoption;
  • adoption should be considered before long term fostering or residential care;
  • and, decisions on whether a child may be able to safely return to their birth parent(s) must be made within a legislated timeframe, such as six months of an interim care order for children under two years old, or within 12 months for older children’.

These recommendations make ‘forced’ adoption legal.

Implementation of such policies will place many disadvantaged mothers, fathers and families of children in Out of Home Care, and also young unsupported mothers, in exactly the same legal position as those who lost their children to the adoption system of the 20th century.

Just as unmarried mothers were labelled ‘unfit’, all who struggle to meet constraints of the ‘new’ adoption policy, are at risk of being labelled ‘deadbeat’, ‘emotionally unstable’, ‘weak’ and of course their stories will be ‘silenced’.

The proposal that Commonwealth adoption laws be enacted for all states and territories, presents the potential for abuse of power from within government and private adoption agencies and alarmingly, the potential for familial abuse of voiceless adopted children who will disappear from government oversight through legal adoption.

Adoptee Rights Australia Inc. suggests the Australian government is ‘years behind’ in adoption research and are ignoring successful alternatives to adoption.

ARA welcomes your interest and invites discussion of both past and potential future impact of ‘new’ and legal ‘forced’ adoption policies and practices in Australia. option/Report

3 Replies to “Australian Adult Adoptees Silenced by Commonwealth Parliamentary Inquiry into Local Adoption”

  1. My son was I allege abducted at birth in year 2000 whilst we the birth parents were to spend five days with a premature, genetically deformed baby which we watched die on the sixth day. There were signatures taken from me the mother on the correct days legally for an adoption though I was lead to believe I was signing for an emergency caesarean and autopsy burial. I am attempting to get assistance from anyone in the world at this stage with this situation. I have already attempted AFP, Medical Board, Ombudsman, Medical Commissioner, FIND, VANISH, ARMS, Medical Investigators, private investigators and lawyers. I have also written to the government regarding the local adoption inquiry earlier this year regarding this whole thing since I began researching to my utter hell of finding that my supposed dead son is not dead and my whole life is not only ruined by the most extreme fraud but the most abominable crime of way to secure a baby I have come across yet worldwide. Believe me I have been studying and researching the hell out of this. To be told that the grave that you go to regularly to cry over your dead baby and your inability to have children and that the actual caesarean – the whole thing was a hoax to steal your live healthy son frankly I spend a lot of time wanting to kill a small group of doctors I intend to have them jailed one way or another. I have so far had death threats, evidence tampered with, my house broken into, evidence stolen and the common assault is everything I do is hacked. Ultimately they hope I will commit suicide my latest house has had such things as nooses put up in the chicken shed etc but I live for one thing and that is to expose these people who though it gives me shivers are currently running some hospitals. I believe I have one other Victorian woman whom have had the six day baby death scenario done by some of the same people and I believe we are not alone. I seek for all people to know this is what is being done in Australia the farcical good nation with upholding of human rights whom behind closed doors are doing some of the worst crimes to humans in the known world.

  2. I have just become aware of ARA as an adoptee who was given to adoptive parents who were mentally ill, alcoholic , violent and neglectful. My adoptive father suicided when I was 15 and I was forced to leave school and work. My adoptive mother did not want to provide any housing or financial support.
    The Government apology was a start but the recommendations in the article on ARA site which have not been acted on are in my view essential to make any meaningful reparations to adoptees who lives have been profoundly disadvantaged by adoption practices of my era. I remember being called a bastard as a child. I had been adopted by the catholic church. My story is one of marginalization by my adoptive family, being used as a servant and subsequently living with abuse for my lifetime until recently. I am now 65. I am aware there are thousands who have similar or worse lives than mine. I do not want to see the government continue the fairy tale adoption story through legislation and silencing of victims of past practices which have remained well hidden from the public to date. I would like to participate on any work to assist in bringing this matter to the wider community .

  3. Christine, you are a survivor-congratulations. I bet you will make a great contribution to highlighting adoption issues. I was born in 1958. I had a “good” adoption but it still caused great pain that until recently affected the way I lived.

    The Gillard govt. funding to Relationships Australia provided grants and counselling which assisted me and a self help group I was part of

Comments are closed.